Can it be achievable to discover a "Common formulation" that generates and generalizes all odd Collatz quantities?
whilst assuming that you are discussing lots of individuals. It does feel as though if I were to put myself in to the footwear of inquiring this concern that "has" would suggest a unusual demonstrate of hands although "have" would suggest, perhaps, a significant protection.
So, with that being a grammatical background, Let us take a look at the OP's context for anyone prospect inquiries. The OP's context is described as:
The OP's dilemma consists of The subject of interrogative pronouns (e.g. "who" and "what") and also the concern of whether they may very well be thought to be singular or plural.
Laure has explained The main reason why in her article. If you want to keep it up asking "who've..?", that's fantastic. I am just indicating you will not hear a native say it Until They are undertaking it consciously for comedic influence.
I guess the single excess letter is considered worthwhile, in order to be not as likely to conflict which has a doable two-letter abbreviation for something else. So, when writing, We're going to often use "United states" mainly because it is shorter than "The united states" or "Usa". We make use of the abbreviation depending on the full identify, Despite the fact that when we don't abbreviate then we usually make use of a shorter identify, Until we actually need your entire title (almost certainly since we are trying to be as official as you possibly can).
In reality, the term "America of The united states" is just not Utilized in typical speech nearly as routinely as being the shorter names. We generally depart off the "of The us", or go away off "The usa of". We'll at times use "US" or "U.S." as an abbreviation. (For illustration: "He went to Europe, after which you can got back again towards the U.S.") When basically writing items down, I have found that to be attending to be less popular than "United states of america".
Without 'it' you might be lacking the article of the sentence that the verb 'is' relates to. Your which is the toughest exam in the world mistake is in wanting to make 'language' work as whether it is the object, when actually it is the issue the article in the sentence is staying compared to.
A probable context for [twenty.ii] is a person the place I am addressing a bunch of students and assuming that a plurality of these have not handed inside their assignments; singular hasn't
"In some cases there is multiple. Out of your five following statements, which two are accurate?" – Smock
.. to me." It is also utilized to make clear or emphasize that you choose to carried out the motion and never another person. "I caught the fish myself" implies I did it, not someone else, and I experienced no or nominal assistance.
Stack Trade network contains 183 Q&A communities such as Stack Overflow, the biggest, most dependable on-line Local community for builders to find out, share their know-how, and build their Occupations. Take a look at Stack Exchange
I think it ought to be "which are" rather than "which is" as I do think "which" modifies "numerous explanations", which is really a plural noun phrase.
isn't utilised like that in every day interaction, and Seems Odd to a native speaker. If you had been in some location where from the meanwhile